Skip to content
  • The Firm
  • Team
    • Associates
    • Lawyers
    • Administrative
    • Interns
  • Practice Areas
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Tax Law
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Bankruptcy
    • Labor Law
    • Dedicated Performance (General Counsel)
  • Careers
  • Contents
    • Articles and Publications
    • In the media
    • Informatives
    • Videos and Podcasts
  • Contact
  • English
  • The Firm
  • Team
    • Associates
    • Lawyers
    • Administrative
    • Interns
  • Practice Areas
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Tax Law
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Bankruptcy
    • Labor Law
    • Dedicated Performance (General Counsel)
  • Careers
  • Contents
    • Articles and Publications
    • In the media
    • Informatives
    • Videos and Podcasts
  • Contact
  • English
  • The Firm
  • Team
    • Associates
    • Lawyers
    • Administrative
    • Interns
  • Practice Areas
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Tax Law
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Bankruptcy
    • Labor Law
    • Dedicated Performance (General Counsel)
  • Careers
  • Contents
    • Articles and Publications
    • In the media
    • Informatives
    • Videos and Podcasts
  • Contact
  • English

TST suspends cases that discuss the validity of collective bargaining clauses that reduce labor rights

  • 16 de January de 2025
  • Informatives
  • English

Jayme Petra de Mello Neto
Lawyer at Marcos Martins Advogados

Although the discussion is not recent, it was on October 10 that Sub-section 1 Specialized in Individual Disputes (SDI-1) of the Superior Labor Court decided, by a majority vote, to suspend all cases, in all instances, that question the validity of a collective agreement that reduces labor rights not guaranteed by the Federal Constitution until the Federal Supreme Court decides on the matter, which is the subject of general repercussion, which still has no date set for it to happen.

On June 28 of this year, Justice Gilmar Mendes of the Federal Supreme Court, examining an extraordinary appeal that discussed the issue of hours in itinere of a mining company that provided transportation for its employees, concluded that there is a constitutional issue with general repercussion in normative clauses that reduce or restrict labor rights not provided for in the Magna Carta, ordering the national suspension of all cases dealing with the issue.

The Supreme Court’s decision will decide one of the great controversies brought about by the Labor Reform in force since 2017, which is the prevalence of collective and individual agreements (between employer and employee) over legislation, whose general repercussion has been recognized.

In general terms, general repercussion, i.e. that it deals with issues considered relevant from an economic, political, social or legal point of view, and that go beyond the subjective interests of the case, is one of the requirements for admissibility of extraordinary appeals before the Federal Supreme Court imposed by Constitutional Amendment 45 of 2004, and its purpose is to ensure uniform decisions, whether of a material or procedural nature, throughout the country, preserving essential legal certainty.

As long as this issue is not decided by the Supreme Court, labor cases on the subject will remain at a standstill at the TST, waiting first for a decision on the merits to be made and then granted or denied, which will paralyze a significant number of labor cases across the country.

Questions? Talk to our lawyers.


Gustavo Michel Arbach

  • Partner in the Corporate area
  • Business and Corporate Law
  • [email protected]
  • (11) 4084-8900
VER PERFIL

Letícia Varela de Aragão Farias

  • Attorney
  • Civil Litigation and Arbitration
  • [email protected]
  • +55 (11) 4084-8900
VER PERFIL

Lais Vaz Mustafa Zogbi

  • Attorney
  • Civil Litigation and Arbitration
  • [email protected]
  • (11) 4084-8900
VER PERFIL

Alan Dantas

  • Attorney
  • Labor Law
  • [email protected]
  • +55 (11) 4084-8900
VER PERFIL

Matheus Belardinelli Rosa

  • Attorney
  • Tax Law
  • [email protected]
  • +55 (11) 4084-8900
VER PERFIL

Arthur Ferreira

  • Intern
  • Civil Litigation and Arbitration
  • [email protected]
  • (11) 4084-8900
VER PERFIL

Bárbara Caldeira Aguiar

  • Attorney
  • Business and Corporate Law
  • [email protected]
  • (11) 4084-8900
VER PERFIL

Share on social media

Related

Globo rural

Credit challenges for the Brazilian agro-industry

crédito para a agroindústria

Credit challenges for the Brazilian agro-industry

Responsabilidade dos herdeiros pelas dívidas do falecido

Heirs’ liability for the deceased’s debts: how does it work?

PERSE
Informatives

Is this the end of PERSE? Federal Revenue publishes declaratory act extinguishing the tax benefit

Learn more
25 de March de 2025
Marcos Martins Advogados e Arbach Farhat.
Informatives

Marcos Martins Advogados and Arbach & Farhat: a new phase to drive the future forward

Learn more
24 de March de 2025
Revista Cobertura
Civil

New insurance law brings pacifying solutions and controversial points

Learn more
21 de March de 2025
Fraude à Execução: STJ decide sobre doar imóvel à parente sem registro de penhora.
Civil

Fraudulent execution: STJ decides on donating property to relative without registration of seizure

Learn more
20 de March de 2025
Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5
  • Menu
  • The Firm
  • Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Menu
  • The Firm
  • Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Contents
  • Articles and Publications
  • Informatives
  • Videos and Podcasts
  • In the media
  • Contents
  • Articles and Publications
  • Informatives
  • Videos and Podcasts
  • In the media

São Paulo

Av. Magalhães de Castro, 4.800, Park Tower - 17º andar
Jardim Panorama, São Paulo/SP
+55 (11) 4084-8900
Ver mapa

Marília

Rua Presidente Vargas, 347
Boa Vista - Marília/SP
+55 (14) 3413-2223
Ver mapa

[email protected]

Marcos Martins Advogados 2025 @ All rights reserved